Die individuelle Vorstellung vom "Wiedergeboren sein" oder vom "Jesus als seinen persönlichen Herrn und Retter annehmen" (meist mittels eines einfachen Gebetes) hat es in der Geschichte der Christenheit in den letzten 2.000 Jahren nie gegeben. Warum? Weil Glaube nie nur als etwas rein individuelles gesehen wurde. Glaube ist ein Gnadengeschenk Gottes, das durch unsere freie Antwort angenommen wird. Diese Gnade erhält aber keiner nur für sich, sondern immer im Zusammenhang mit der Gemeinschaft aller Gläubigen - der Kirche als Leib Christi. Christus möchte uns nicht zu Egoisten erziehen - unsere Sendung, unsere Berufung und unsere Erlösung geschieht nie nur für uns alleine, sondern kann nur im Verbund mit der Berufung und Erlösung des Nächsten geschehen. Niemand existiert hier auf einer Insel. Wir sind gerufen, Bott, den Nächsten und uns selbst zu lieben - und das gibt es nur im Gesamtpaket! Abgesehen steht die Taufe zu Beginn unseres Daseins als Christen. Ein einfaches Gebet reicht hier nicht aus (viele nennen Jesus ihren Herrn - das tun letztlich auch die Dämonen, wie Er selbst sagte! Das reine Aussprechen des Wortes macht uns noch nicht zu Christen!)
Auch ist die Stelle (das Gespräch mit Nikodemus) im Kontext zu sehen - vor allem im Zusammenhang mit den vorausgehenden Kapiteln und des griechischen Originals. Hier ist nicht das Konzept vom "Wiedergeborenseins" angesprochen, das bei einigen evangelikalen Gemeinden vorherrscht, sondern des "Geborenseins von oben", also durch den Heiligen Geist - in der Gemeinschaft der Kirche!
(Quelle: u.a. http://www.fernkurswuerzburg.de/)
(in Vorbereitung)
Tatsächlich? Sehen wir uns 2 Tim 2,12 an: "wenn wir standhaft bleiben, werden wir auch mit ihm herrschen; wenn wir ihn verleugnen, wird auch er uns verleugnen." (Einheitsübersetzung).
Standhaftigkeit und Durchhaltevermögen sind also Grundvoraussetzungen, um es bis "nach oben" zu schaffen. Wenn wir die Erlösung schon garantiert und sicher hätten, sobald wir einmal "gerettet" sind, warum sollten wir dann standhaft bleiben, um in den Himmel zu kommen, wie wir es hier lesen? Wir müssen das Rennen bis zum Ziellauf durchhalten. Jesus sagt uns in Lk 9,23, dass jemand, der Ihm nachfolgen will, sich selbst verleugnen und täglich sein Kreuz auf sich nehmen muss. Das widerspricht aber der Vorstellung von "einmal gerettet, immer gerettet"!
(Quelle: www.saintjoe.com)
Lesen wir Mt 7,21: "Nicht jeder, der zu mir sagt: Herr! Herr!, wird in das Himmelreich kommen, sondern nur, wer den Willen meines Vaters im Himmel erfüllt" (Einheitsübersetzung). Wir müssen also den Willen unseres Vaters im Himmel tun. Einfach nur zu sagen, Jesus ist unser Herr, ist nicht genug! Es reicht noch nicht einmal, Wunder iin Seinem Namen zu vollbringen oder das Evangelium zu verkünden. Es ist einfach eine Irrlehre, zu glauben, wir hätten einen festen Platz im Himmel! Wer so etwas glaubt, setzt tatsächlich seine Errettung auf's Spiel!
Nun zu Jn 14,21: "Wer meine Gebote hat und sie hält, der ist es, der mich liebt; wer mich aber liebt, wird von meinem Vater geliebt werden und auch ich werde ihn lieben und mich ihm offenbaren." (Einheitsübersetzung).
Wir müssen also Gottes Gebote halten! Die "einmal gerettet, immer gerettet"-Theologie ist nicht biblisch! Wie wir hier sehen, müssen wir mehr tun als nur Jesus als unseren persönlichen Herrn und Retter zu akzeptieren und das Sündergebet zu beten. Unsere Liebe zu Gott zeigt sich in dem, was wir tun, wie wir handeln, reden usw. Unsere Erlösung ist kein abgeschlossenenes und besiegeltes Geschäft! Ein Christ hat sein Kreuz zu tragen und Gutes zu tun: "Darum, liebe Brüder - ihr wart ja immer gehorsam, nicht nur in meiner Gegenwart, sondern noch viel mehr jetzt in meiner Abwesenheit-: müht euch mit Furcht und Zittern um euer Heil!" (Phil 2,12 - Einheitsübersetzung).
(Quelle: www.saintjoe.com)
Wurdest du auch schon einmal gefragt, ob du eine "persönliche Beziehung zu Jesus Christus hast"? Bei solchen Fragen bin ich froh, katholisch zu sein.
Abgesehen davon, dass die Kirche in den letzten 2.000 Jahren den Glauben nie als etwas persönliches gesehen hat, sondern immer in Zusammenhang mit dem Leib Christi, der Gemeinschaft der Glaubenden in der Kirche (keiner erhält seine Gaben für sich alleine, sondern soll sie zum Wohl der Kirche verwenden!) - als Katholiken haben wir die Eucharistie!
In der Eucharistie kommt Jesus Christus selbst zu uns - wir nehmen Ihn in uns auf!
Wie persönlich kann man noch werden?
(Frei nach Fr. Bill Casey)
Therefore, whoever thinks he is standing secure should take care not to fall. 1Cor 10:12
Now someone approached him and said, "Teacher, what good must I do to gain eternal life?" He answered him, "Why do you ask me about the good? There is only One who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments." (Matt 19:16-17)
"Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" Jesus said to him, "What is written in the law? How do you read it?" He said in reply, "You shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your being, with all your strength, and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself." He replied to him, "You have answered correctly; do this and you will live." Luke 10:25-28
"Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes in the one who sent me has eternal life and will not come to condemnation, but has passed from death to life." John 5:24
"Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day." John 6:54
"You will be hated by all because of my name, but whoever endures to the end will be saved." Matt 10:22
"Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; whoever does not believe will be condemned." Mark 16:16
Jesus answered, "Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit. John 3:5
(Quelle: http://www.infpage.com/concordance/additional.htm)
In light of the emphasis of contemporary evangelicalism on the role or place of a personal relationship with Christ, it behooves the authors to put this emphasis in an historical perspective, in this appendix.
Some Catholic Christians and some non-believers are often heard to say that the Church never taught that a "personal relationship with Christ" was necessary for salvation.
The term "personal relationship" is, first of all, not biblical. Neither word nor the compound phrase is found in the Bible. But then, neither are such terms as "Trinity", "Incarnation", "Eucharist", "Lord's Supper", etc., found in the Bible. The expression "personal relationship" comes neither from the language of the Bible nor from the history of Christian faith. The expression comes from the humanist psychology of the last hundred years, principally that of Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers and Eric Fromm. It also has its roots in over emphasis on the attitude of rugged individualism of the early development of America.
In using the expression "personal relationship" there is a danger in attempting to harmonize the formulas of the Bible with the formulas of psychology, psychiatry, and/or American nationalism. The language of the Bible and the languages of psychology, psychiatry, and nationalism reflect divergent perceptions and conceptualizations. Attempting to treat them as identical can only be artificial.
How did the Catholic Church of the past and how does the Church of the present teach the relationship each Christian must have with his or her Lord and Savior?
Many see the foundation for a personal relationship with Jesus implicit in John chapter three.
Nicodemus, as Christians to follow for all ages, asked Jesus in return what was it that will allow a man to be "begotten from above." Jesus answered him repeating Himself:
Again Nicodemus presses Jesus for a further explanation. Jesus answers only that belief and action - deeds, works done in God - will accomplish what is required.
But Jesus seems not to be entirely clear on the requirements. But as the Church has taught through all ages, all of the Bible does present clear requirements for the Christian's relationship to Jesus.
The Catholic Church, using explicit Scriptures, has always found that the basis of a personal relationship with Jesus begins at the origin of the Christian life. The Church, from Pentecost onward, examines the language of Christ and Sacred Scriptures and the content of that language for God's desire for the Christian's relationship to Him. The Church begins at the beginning of life as a Christian.
The origin of the life of a Christian and of Christian perfection to which the Bible constantly calls us, is the Heavenly Father, Who communicates His life through the Son, and through the Son, the Holy Spirit.
The initiative for the life of a Christian is a movement descending from the Father to men: the Father through the Son in the Holy Spirit sanctifies man.
The movement descending from the Father to man touches man first in baptism.
Through this participation the Christian is a new creature living in an atmosphere clearly new.
This new life of the Christian is directly a participation in the life of Christ, is the life of a member, joined with the Head, in the Body of Christ which is the Church.
The movement through Christ in the Father, founded in participation in the divine life - the movement of life in its origin involves union with Christ and - through Christ - with the Father.
The new life of the Christian is an assimilation of God through Christ. This life begins in baptism.
The new life of the Christian is a personal gift of the Father.
The response to this personal communication in the Christian is the gift or the donation of self to God through Christ.
Corresponding to this ontological state, the Christian life is not to be lived for itself, but for Christ and - through Christ - for God.
How is this gift of self of the Christian to be made manifest? It is first manifested in service to God because service to God involves conformity to the divine will and also praise to God.
Christ is the model for the Christian of service in the divine will.
Jesus teaches us that obedience to the will of the Father is our calling.
The total earthly servitude of Christ consummated on the cross was praise and glory to God.
Just as with Christ, the servitude of the Christian is simultaneously praise to God.
The gift of the self for the Christian is the denial of self.
In the life of the Father through Christ, charity/love holds first place.
(Quelle: http://romanticcatholic.com/apologetics.html - used with permission)
Ever been asked the question: “If you were to die tonight do you have absolute assurance that you will go to Heaven?”
That’s a question that many Evangelicals use when approaching Catholics to try and start the process of pulling them out of the Catholic Church. I recently attended a seminar at Briarwood Presbyterian Church (PCA), which is one of the largest – if not the largest – Protestant churches in the Birmingham area. They were holding a series of classes over a several week period on various non-Christian belief systems. They had one on Atheism, on Islam, on Jehovah’s Witnesses, on Mormonism, and then guess which non-Christian faith tradition they covered after Mormonism? You got it! Roman Catholicism! (And please read “Roman Catholicism” with a sort of deep and sinister tone in your head.)
Well, I didn’t attend the other classes, but I did go to this one. And, one of the pieces of literature they handed out was on how to approach Catholics so as to witness to them about Jesus Christ. Below is first the text of the “approach” they suggested, and then my comments follow.
Challenge/Response/Strategy
“A Simple Approach in Witnessing [to Roman Catholics]”
1. Don’t attack Roman Catholicism!!!
2. Ask them the question, “Are you a Christian?” (They will probably answer, “Yes, I’m a Catholic.”)
3. Respond by saying, “Great, then do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Savior?” (They will probably answer, “Yes”.)
4. Ask, “If you died tonight, do you know for sure that you have eternal life, that you will go to heaven and be with the Lord?” (They will probably respond that they hope so or they are trying, or how is it possible to know that.)
5. If they indicate that they don’t know for sure then ask: “What is it that separates us from God?” (The answer you want is sin: Rom 3:32, 6:23.)
6. Then ask, “Which sin of ours doesn’t Christ fully atone for?” (The answer should be none – He died for all our sins. 1 Pet 3:18; Heb 10:10–12; Rom 8:1; Rom 5:1.)
7. State: “To truly receive Christ as your Savior, you must trust in Him alone, that He took all of our sins on the cross that we might know that we have eternal life (1 John 5:11–13).”
My Response:
Well, we’re good up until Question #4. The first thing I do whenever someone asks me this question is to immediately ask them: “Where is that question in the Bible?” Where does Jesus, or Paul, or Peter, or James, or anyone else ask someone, “If you died tonight do you know for sure that you would go to Heaven?” Ask them to give you book, chapter, and verse. They can’t do it, because that question is not in the Bible. In other words, these “Bible–only” Christians have made up some sort of salvation test that is nowhere found in the Bible…it is a man–made invention.
Now, of course they’ll come up with some sort of reply to your question, and then get back to asking you to answer their question. So, when asked if you “know” that you would go to Heaven should you “die tonight,” go ahead and answer the question like this: ”I do not judge myself. I am not aware of anything against myself, but that does not mean I am acquitted. It is the Lord Who judges me.”
Now, if they try and point out that the Bible says that we can “know” – which they interpret to mean “have absolute assurance” – that we are saved and heading to Heaven and, therefore, any one who is “really” a Christian would have absolute assurance of their salvation, then simply repeat, “I do not judge myself. I am not aware of anything against myself, but that does not mean I am acquitted. It is the Lord Who judges me.” If they then imply, or come right out and say, that your response is faulty, or somehow wrong, or that your response indicates that you are not saved – which they will eventually do – then simply point out that your response is almost an exact quote from Paul – 1 Cor 4:3–4. Tell them you are simply answering their non–scriptural question with a quote from Scripture itself. And, if they take that to somehow mean that you are not saved, then they are directly insinuating that Paul himself must not have been saved…because those are Paul’s words!
Or, another option would be to simply say, “Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed, lest he fall.” Again, this is a direct quote from Paul (1 Cor 10:12), that will throw your questioner for a loop.
Now, if you want to get all the way throug h the test, rather than engaging in battle at Question #4, you could simply answer #4 with something like this: “I am not the judge of such things, God is.” Which is basically what Paul is saying, but since it’s not a direct quote from Scripture they may not recognize that you have responded with a solid scriptural principle – God is our judge, we are not.
So, let’s say you answer #4 with, “I am not my own judge, God is,” and they then interpret that as the poor little Catholic taking the bait and they move in to spring the trap with question #5, “What is it that separates us from God?” And you, quite rightly, answer with, “Sin.” They then think they’ve sealed the deal with Question #6, “Which sin of ours doesn’t Christ fully atone for?”
What do you do? How do you respond?
What I would say in response to the question: “Which sin of ours doesn’t Christ fully atone for,” is this: “The unrepented one.” Now, Christ did indeed atone for all of our sins, repented and unrepented; however, the atonement is not applied to the unrepented sins. So turn around and ask your questioner this: “Does Christ forgive YOUR unrepented sins?” Now this could present quite a problem to your questioner, because this person, based on the fact that they asked you this series of questions, undoubtedly believes not only in salvation by faith alone, but also in the dogma of once saved, always saved. In other words, they believe that once they’ve accepted Jesus, they are going to Heaven no matter what they do after that.
So, because they believe in once saved, always saved, they have to believe that Christ forgives their sins whether they repent of them or not. Yet, if they answer your question with a, “Yes,” Christ does indeed forgive their unrepented sins, they are flying in the face of Scripture: 1 John 1:9, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” “If,” we confess our sins. If we repent. If we don’t, we are not forgiven. If we are not forgiven, we are not saved. This can also be very clearly seen in Jesus’ words to the seven churches in Rev 2 and 3.
But, if they answer in accord with Scripture and say, “No,” Christ does not forgive their unrepented sins, then how can they believe in once saved, always saved? Because once they’re saved, they could always commit a sin for which they do not repent. God does not force us to repent. Repentance is not automatic, even for a Christian. And, if they have a sin for which they h aven’t repented, which means it hasn’t been forgiven, which means they have lost their salvation since, as they pointed out earlier, sin separates us from Christ…then how can once saved always saved be true?
Now, as in any of these situations, they will have undoubtedly have a response…words will come out of their mouths. But, I can guarantee you that it is not a response that will make much scriptural sense. So, no matter what they say in response to your question, examine it very carefully because it will not be consistent either with Scripture, or with one of their earlier statements. There will be a disconnect…an inconsistency…in what they say, guaranteed. You just have to pay attention and just keep coming back to your question until they have given you a logically and scripturally–consistent answer.
And, if they ever get to #7, tell them that you agree with that statement 100%. As a Catholic, we believe that we must trust in Christ and in Him alone for our salvation. We believe that His death on the cross paid the full price for our sins that we may know that we have eternal life. However, you don’t necessarily agree with their interpretation of the verses from Scripture that they are alluding to. Again, they interpret the word “know” as meaning “absolute assurance,” which, in fact, it does not necessarily mean, and they wring a “once saved, always saved” dogma out of the Scriptures that they are twisting in order to try and pull you out of the Church. Yet, the dogma of once saved, always saved, flies directly in the face of Scripture.
You can conclude by telling your questioner that you believe you were saved by God’s grace alone, but that now that you are saved, in order to run the race to the end, you need to cooperate with God’s grace in your l ife and produce good fruit, or you will be like the branches of the vine in John 15:1–6 that get cut off from the vine, thrown into the fire, and burned. And ask them if they believe they will remain a branch of the vine if they do not produce good fruit. See what they say…
In Conclusion
The guy that presented this class at Briarwood Presbyterian is a Protestant apologist who is known nationally for his work with cults – and, yes, he believes the Catholic Church is a cult. I proposed to him at the end of his class that we have a public “dialogue” at Briarwood Presbyterian so that both sides of the issue can be fairly presented. He agreed, and I’m waiting to see if he follows up. If not, I’ll soon follow up with him.
(Quelle: www.biblechristiansociety.com - used with permission)
Catholic Answers: Born Again in Baptism
Catholic Answers: Are Catholics Born Again?
Catholic Information Network: Salvation
Steve Ray: Born Again?
Coronum Catholic Apologetic Web Page: Once Saved NOT Always Saved (Church Fathers)
Coronum Apologetic Web Page: Church Fathers on "Born Again"
Mark Brumley: Are Catholics Born Again?